RIP Rohith Vemula

Rohith Vemula speaking

There was a candlelight vigil today in Hyderabad to honor Rohith Vemula, a graduate student who hung himself after being persecuted & thrown out of school by university officials for being a Dalit (formerly known as untouchable) activist.

He was an embodiment of what Gramsci called the “organic intellectual,” a person from the oppressed with a unique ability to educate & inspire others because he did not place himself above his caste nor seek to rise above others but only to rise with the oppressed. His tragic death continues to broaden & strengthen the movement against caste oppression. May he RIP. May his fighting spirit inspire the struggle against oppression & inequality everywhere.

(Photo is Rohith Vemula speaking)

Those stinking rotten politicians want a merit-based immigration system. What they mean is a class-based system so that the rich can become citizens but working people are excluded. I say hang the politicians.

“Chain immigration” is like “anchor baby”–just racist rubbish against immigrants. Dumb-as-a-stump Trump has made it & the barrier wall blackmail to retain DACA. How does not allowing families to reunite correspond to the rightwing’s ‘family values’ crap? There is also the caveat that DACA is a temporizing policy. In exchange for handing the government your name, address, & job site, DACA gives young people temporary work & education rights with no commitment it will lead to citizenship. That way when the government tries to end DACA (as they are threatening to do now), immigration officers know just where to pick you up.

We should defend DACA but we should fight for an immigration policy based on the Statue of Liberty, not on Trump’s racism & stupidities.

Kashmiri women artists on occupation

Pellet victim by Hina Arif

Art, music, literature have always & everywhere been an essential part of resistance to political repression, occupation, oppression. There have been quite a few reports about how Kashmiris use rap music, novels, art to express opposition to occupation. This is an excellent article about Kashmiri women artists using art to resist.

http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/7/12720/Kashmirs-Young-Women–Artists-Explore-New-Ways-To-Express-Resistance

Rest In Peace Dalit activist Rohith Vemula

Rohith Vemula Jan 17 2017

Reposting this eulogy of Dalit activist Rohith Vemula who committed suicide on January 17th, 2016 as a tribute to his life & to the leadership he gave the struggle against caste oppression:
******

It’s been two years today since Rohith Vemula took his own life. The loss of someone to suicide is a grief filled with questions that cannot be answered, confusions over what might have been, guilt and recriminations about who’s at fault and what could have been done to prevent it, if only we’d known. In the end, it was his decision long in the making that he, “a glorious thing made up of star dust,” as he so beautifully described human beings, could not live without the freedom of spirit he needed so burdened was he with the dead weight of inequality.

We may grieve for a very long time but we have to trust he understood something about himself that he would not let others see: “My birth is my fatal accident. I can never recover from my childhood loneliness. The unappreciated child from my past.” That spiritual melancholy he expressed so poignantly is the isolation and humiliation of oppression, of being disrespected and looked down upon for who you are. It is human beings, so strong and yet so vulnerable, who bear the weight of social and political inequality which devour the soul & sometimes exhaust the psychic energies to resist them.

He was a man keenly sensitive to nature, human love, pain, life, death, and the distinctions between the sincere and artificial. The sensitivity and insight are what made him a fighter and yet kept him so vulnerable. Oppression weighs heavier on some, on the thinkers, the ones who care about others the deepest. But for himself, he felt empty and believed in others more than he believed in himself. He gave others respect because he knew its value and its power and probably never understood his own. Those are the confusions that come from inequality.

No one holds education in greater esteem than the oppressed, not as a matter of status but of empowerment, and there are remarkable stories of the lengths the oppressed have gone just to learn. Intellectual aspirations are discouraged, often mocked, and always made difficult to achieve by those in power. That’s why in US history, it was newly freed slaves in the south who first introduced free public education available to all.

Rohith was a naturally intellectual person, curious and eager to understand. University officials probably well understood that about him and detested that in him, which is why they took away his stipend and suspended him. It was the place they knew he was most committed and therefore most vulnerable. That makes them culpable in his death. He was an embodiment of what Gramsci awkwardly called the “organic intellectual.” His intellectual commitments derived energy from being oppressed and from identifying with his caste. His unique ability to educate and inspire others was because he did not place himself above them nor seek to rise above others but only to rise with the oppressed to end inequality once and for all.

We shall always regret the choice he made in death though we trust he knew best when he had reached the limits of his endurance. We wish we could tell him we would never judge him selfish, stupid, or a coward as he thought but will always honor the choices he made in life to stand resolutely against inequality and thus be part of ending it.

When asked what could Rohith Vemula possibly mean to an American socialist and activist the answer is, the same as he means to Dalits and other oppressed castes. He was one of ours, he stood with us, fought for us and with us, believed in our capacities to change the world. For that we honor him. May he Rest In Peace, at one now with the star he came from.

The good thing about the little Toronto girl getting caught lying about a man taking a scissor to her hijab is that she learned young that lies have consequences. The president of the US doesn’t know that & he’s 70-something. Most importantly, the international response showed that outrage was on her side.

It turns out that the 11-year-old girl in Toronto who claimed a man bounced on her from behind & took a scissor to her hijab was making the story up. The little brother she was walking with probably ratted her out. The problem with false reports is that it makes people skeptical about other such incidents. But the girl was eleven & certainly had no idea her lie would set off international headlines. Good that it didn’t happen.

Catherine Deneuve & 100 other stupid French women come out slugging in favor of sexual assault

Deneuve (Maurizio Gambarini:Anadolu Agency, via Getty Images) Jan 15 2017

Actress Catherine Deneuve & over 100 other French women in entertainment, publishing, & academia have signed a public letter in Le Monde denouncing the #MeToo movement & its French counterpart, #Balancetonporc (Expose Your Pig). The letter titled “We defend the freedom to pester indispensable to sexual freedom” says it is a “rejection of a certain feminism that expresses a hatred of men.” There is no indication that any of the women have ever had any association with feminism but apparently most of them are “women of a certain age,” so media does not hesitate to associate them with 1960-1970s feminism. Among the signatories is Catherine Millet, a writer best known for a memoir graphically detailing her sex life who last month said she “really regretted not having been raped because I could have shown that you get over it”; Catherine Robbe-Grillet, the author of sadomasochistic writings; Brigitte Lahaie, a 1970s porn star turned talk-show host; & Deneuve who was a Playboy centerfold twice during the 1960s when nudity in film & porn was being shoved on actresses to promote their careers whether they liked it or not.

The deeply embarrassing letter has such a low political level that it could have been written by Huge Hefner or Harvey Weinstein because it mocks unwanted sexual advances, even on a subway, as just men trying to show affection & defends such aggression as “indispensable freedom to offend.” It also associates objection to sexual assault as censorious, puritanical & authoritarian. Since so many know-nothing anti-feminists have attempted to vilify 1960-1970s feminists as “sex-negative” blue-nosed prudes, it is beyond sarcasm that Henri Astier, the male journalist who wrote the BBC article, associates such libertine nonchalance about sexual aggression with older feminists & tries to distance them from younger feminists who he claims recognize sexual assault for what it is. What Astier shares with those who make such imputations against earlier feminism is complete idiocy & ignorance of what 1960s feminism stood for as well as the debates among feminists today about what “empowerment” means.

Let’s set the record straight: 1960-1970s feminism was part of the sexual revolution as part of the fight for reproductive rights which were illegal in most states & to oppose the massive sterilization programs of Black, Latino, Native American, & disabled women. Our work advanced healthcare for women & made inroads against the barbaric treatment of rape victims. We fought sexual harassment in the workplace & put the spotlight on sexual assault of children within the family, which until then had been a dirty little secret where the children were not believed. Freud glorified sexual assault of children as an Oedipal Complex–a masterpiece of blaming the victim. Feminists took that rubbish on head-first despite being vilified as old maids too ugly to get a man or man-hating lesbians.

Catherine Deneuve & the other signers of this French letter do not represent feminism of any generation. They are not standing for freedom of any kind but are groveling before the power of misogyny–maybe for personal problems but more likely to get published. It is not within the realm of possibility that none of these women know the indignities & terrors of sexual assault. There isn’t a woman alive who isn’t intimately familiar with sexual aggression. The letter is an antisocial piece of crap, a shameful capitulation to the hatred of women.

One more thing; there is a massive international effort to distance older feminists from younger feminists, to discredit the former & claim they have aged out of political relevance. This is not based on the politics of feminism–which are anyway very diverse–but on an attempt to shut down debate, vilify older women, including as racists, & divide & destroy the struggle against women’s oppression. The TERF & SWERF crap is part of that. This French letter is part of that. The only appropriate response is to shove such rubbish where the sun don’t shine. Shame on Catherine Deneuve & the other signers. What they need is a good dose of feminism to smarten their asses up.

(Photo is Deneuve by Maurizio Gambarini/Anadolu Agency, via Getty Images)

Syrian children (tweeted by Nino Fezza) Jan 14 2018

This child is actually from Gaza during Israel’s 2014 carpet bombing siege that lasted seven weeks. It’s one of the least gruesome images of the 495 children killed in that offensive. I misidentified it as children from east Ghouta in Syria during Syria & Russia’s current bombing siege of civilians. It is profoundly sad that the little ones could be from any number of countries today facing war, occupation, or genocide.