It may seem excessive, but posting all the #StandWithKashmir protests around the world is so we know the scope of this emerging movement & so that Kashmiris can also when they return from lockdown by ‘the largest democracy in the world’.

Kashmiris & supporters at #StandWithKashmir rally at Grand Mosque Bahrain. Bahrainis had an extraordinary Arab Spring uprising that was massively & violently repressed & understand the struggle of Kashmiris.

Kashmiris & supporters at #StandWithKashmir rally in Bahrain:

پاکستان کمیونٹی بحرین کی جانب سےالافتح گرینڈ مسجد میں نماز عید کے بعد کشمیری بھائیوں سے اظہار یکجتی کے لیے پر امن احتجاج کیا گیا

Posted by United Pakistan in Bahrain on Saturday, August 10, 2019

Arrests of young people & assault on women during Israeli invasion of al-Aqsa Mosque on the morning of Eid Al-a:dha

قمع واعتقالات للشبان واعتداء على النساء خلال اقتحام قوات الاحتلال للمسجد الأقصى

#صور قمع واعتقالات للشبان واعتداء على النساء خلال اقتحام قوات الاحتلال للمسجد الأقصى المبارك في صبيحة يوم عيد الأضحى المبارك

Posted by Shehab News Agency on Sunday, August 11, 2019

Some think solidarity protests are merely symbolic dead-end gestures, feel-good moments or a way to vent indignation for do-gooders. Symbolic, empty gesturing isn’t why Palestinians have held the Great Return Marches for over one year now, facing off unarmed against Israeli snipers. That isn’t why Kashmiris came out yesterday also unarmed against nearly a million soldiers with pellet guns & rubber bullets. That isn’t why Syrian Arab Spring activists protest despite Russian, Syrian, & US-coalition bombing. It isn’t why the Egyptian, Bahraini, Tunisian, Yemeni Arab Spring uprisings organized protests of millions for months nor why the Sudanese protesters continue to protest against military dictatorship. Protests are political power. Protests are to counterpose the power of resistance to the power of tyranny, to mobilize, agitate, educate, broaden, strengthen opposition to war, occupation, persecution, injustice, genocide.

If solidarity protests are not ineffectual, how can we explain that there have been millions who’ve protested for Palestinians but Israel has accelerated genocide & ethnic cleansing? That there were hundreds of thousands who protested for the Rohingya & still they suffer in refugee camps with no prospects for human, democratic, & civil rights in Burma? That there were massive protests against the US invasion of Iraq & now the US controls the country & continues to bomb there? There were millions of women on every continent at the Women’s Marches & still the conditions of life for women & children continue to deteriorate? So what’s the purpose of those protests anyway if they haven’t changed the world? The best authorities on that might be the Vietnamese who encouraged the international antiwar movement, who understood it as a force that could restrain US military aggression. But Vietnam was over 50 years ago & things have changed? Protests are no longer enough?

Protests alone were never enough. Just as they aren’t in Palestine, Kashmir, Burma, Syria, Iraq, China, or anywhere else. Protests are to mobilize those who understand an issue to put political pressure on governments; to educate those who know nothing about what’s going on but would be concerned if they did; to publicly give moral support to those on the front lines of oppression, to let them know they are not alone, that we have their backs. But along with protesting, we have to develop other tactics like educational forums & campaigns, speaking tours, boycotts & campaigns like BDS, strike actions, work stoppages & slow-downs, humanitarian missions & investigative tours. Developing all that requires an authoritative, democratic, international movement & network with a collaborative structure that doesn’t let things be willy-nilly but has the resources & commitment to call emergency actions, coordinated, consistent, regular actions & connects the struggles against war, occupation, genocide.

Maybe 50 years ago we could let such a collaborative structure slide & stick with the ad hoc model of protesting. But not anymore. Palestinians, Kashmiris, Rohingya, Uyghur, Syrians, Afghans, Iraqis, Yemenis, & so many others are facing life & death survival against barbarism, against military power that can push a button & blow up the whole damn world & is trying to do that piece by piece. We need to get our act together & use social media to facilitate that. We should thank our lucky stars the internet & social media emerged just in time for the work we have to do.

Where do we begin? Let’s put our minds together on that & come up with a plan. Right here, right now, today. How do we work together to end the savagery, to support the political power of the oppressed, to make this world suitable for human beings to come of age in before fascism engulfs the whole damn planet or global warming fries us to death, whichever comes first? Call this a manifesto.

“I don’t think I’ve seen enough condemnation of India’s communication blockade in Kashmir. It’s cruel, illegal, immoral and reprehensible. No other country has deprived an entire people of their fundamental right to speak with their loved ones. I condemn it. Will you join me?”

–Kashmiri writer & journalist Mirza Waheed

“Most Indians are so politically illiterate that they do not know their real enemy. It is the Indian State. It is not the Kashmiri people, not even the Pakistani state. Indian citizens who know what is what and which is which know they have a lot more to fear from the Indian State’s legal monopoly over violence, than from the Pakistani state and Islamist terrorism — mostly a manufactured ‘threat’ in the South Asian context so far. The ‘patriots’ of India, especially those who earn a salary for their ‘patriotism’, are enemies of all the peoples in the subcontinent. They are essentially mercenaries of the world imperialist order, and defenders of the pimps of subcontinental natural resources and labour.”

–Indian activist Satyadeep Satya

“Since Kashmiri people have not voted for India in a plebiscite, Parliament had no right to take any decision on Article 370. Not just Parliament, even the Supreme Court has no right to change anything about Kashmir’s relationship with the Republic of India. Not until Kashmiris choose to approve the feudal-autocrat Hari Singh’s decision through free and fair voting. Only Kashmiris have the right to decide on the kind of relationship they want with the Republic of India.”

–Satyadeep Satya