Amnesty has stripped Aung San Suu Kyi–the genocidaire who wears flowers in her hair–of its highest, if not also entirely worthless, honorific. This is only the latest of several human rights awards taken from her, including Canada’s honorary citizenship, plaques from Aberdeen, Edinburgh, Glasgow, & Oxford. What took them so long? It’s quite inscrutable what she gets out of being a central figure in genocide but because of her father’s role in Burmese history, she may see her own role in some imagined epic or mystical way. She has to know that history will not judge her more favorably than Kissinger or Hitler but deems such ignominy worth it.

When researching Suu Kyi for articles I wrote in Pakistan Today in 2017, I learned there isn’t much there-there to her human rights record. It’s not entirely certain why she was considered a human rights icon except speeches she gave during the national uprising of 1988. But she wouldn’t even have been in Burma if she hadn’t gone home from England just then to attend to her ailing mother. Her role is almost accidental except that both parents were leading political figures, including her mother who worked for the military dictatorship as an ambassador. There was no fall from grace for Suu Kyi so much as a snow job by the organizations handing out honorifics. If Kissinger can win the Nobel Peace Prize, why not Assad or Adolf Hitler? Or Suu Kyi? When she was under house arrest, it was in a family mansion in the most exclusive area of town attended to by servants. Not exactly a gulag.

These are the articles I wrote about Suu Kyi:

https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2017/03/03/the-legend-of-aung-san-suu-kyi/?

https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2017/03/17/the-legend-of-aung-san-suu-kyi-part-2/?

https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2017/09/23/aung-san-suu-kyi-and-the-generals/?

To many, my damnations of powerful institutions (like the Democratic Party, European Union, ASEAN) must seem dogmatic, intolerant, unrealistic. Since we live in the barbaric phase of capitalism, I see damnation more as a form of hard-nosed love in the time of cholera, environmental devastation, genocide, & rising fascism. There are many who want to work ‘within the system’ but I don’t like the class of people there or the compromises one has to make. That’s why my politics involve organizing independent of the power structure where we don’t have to bargain or compromise on principles. Principles matter in politics if you want to keep a steady course & not be blown about by fashion or social pressure. That may sound old-fashioned in these times but there’s nothing more sorry-assed than a rebel who ends up chasing saviors rather than fighting for the oppressed.

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) summit will be held from tomorrow through Thursday hosted by Lee Hsien Loong, the dictatorial prime minister of Singapore. It is absolutely excluded that the Rohingya genocide will be addressed in any meaningful way because ASEAN is a free trade/sweatshop economics & military alliance between ten repressive regimes in Southeast Asia, including Burma, the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Brunei, Laos, Malaysia, Singapore. Other countries involved with ASEAN include China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, New Zealand, Russia, Canada, Chile, & the US. Genocide in Burma will not come up because vigilante death squads in the Philippines, military repression in Thailand, political repression in Vietnam & other nations will not come up. Human rights are decidedly not the purpose of these summits.

ASEAN adopted a human rights declaration in 2012 (AICHR) which Burma signed while engaged in a genocidal onslaught against the Rohingya people & while the army was accused of using child soldiers & engaging in mass rape & scorched earth methods against other ethnic groups. The declaration is nothing more than window-dressing signifying nothing to the member countries in terms of child labor, human trafficking, drug trafficking, militarism, death squads, occupation, democratic rights to dissent, political corruption, extrajudicial killings, forcible disappearances, rape as a weapon of war & occupation, refugee rights, religious freedom, genocide. Duterte hosted the 2017 ASEAN summit while he was engaged in a death squad war against the urban poor & a military offensive against Moro Muslims.

This year Suu Kyi, Modi, Putin, Pence, Chinese premier Li, Chilean president Pinera, Duterte will be among the honored guests despite the Rohingya genocide, Indian occupation of Kashmir, Russian bombing of Syria, Chinese & Russian arming of the Rohingya genocide, Chinese genocide of Uyghurs, several US wars, Chile’s genocide against indigenous tribes, & Duterte’s ongoing vigilante war against the urban poor. The biggest issues at the summit will be countering Chinese aggression in the South China Sea & not letting the little matter of war, occupation, or genocide come between trade & sweatshop relationships. ASEAN is an institution of oppression, not an agency for liberation. It is to facilitate investments in a time of capitalist crises, not mitigate monstrous human rights crimes against the working poor.

Photo is Suu Kyi & Modi at the ASEAN-India summit meeting last January in New Delhi.

In an act of supreme sarcasm, George & Laura Bush received the 2018 Philadelphia Liberty Medal for their work with veterans. One would say the invasion of Iraq must be small potatoes to the selection committee except that previous recipients include Shimon Peres, Bill & Hillary Clinton, Kofi Annan, Tony Blair, Robert Gates, George Bush Sr., Colin Powell, John McCain, Oscar Arias–a regular rogue’s gallery of war criminals.

If you want me to get excited about a few mortars from Gaza into Israel, you’ll first have to show some outrage over the thousands killed & injured in Gaza by Israeli snipers & bombers.

Bernie Sanders said not all voters who feel “uncomfortable” with Black candidates are racist. What are they then, Bernie? Just compromised with racism in the same way you are with Israeli genocide against Palestinians? Is there an operative distinction that non-sophists just don’t see?

There is an avalanche of articles vilifying & denouncing white women for supporting Brett Kavanaugh & for voting Republican in the recent US elections. The hysteria–so reminiscent of media campaigns against Second Wave feminists–is coming from establishment media, including the NY Times, Washington Post, Guardian, Time, Vogue, Huntington Post, New Yorker, Globe & Mail, Washington Times, & includes an open letter from feminist Eve Ensler chiding white women for supporting Kavanaugh. Taking their cues from these articles without apparently doing their own investigations, many bloggers are also going after white women for voting white supremacy & privilege over gender oppression.

Most of the statistics these articles throw around in the most obfuscating way are based on exit polls. Doesn’t anybody do their homework anymore? Exit polls are highly controversial in methodology, manipulated tendentiously by the polling agencies (which are beholden to one of the two major parties), & notoriously inaccurate regarding the demographics of voters. Given the tendentiousness of polling agencies & the corruption & anarchic nature of US elections, it is impossible to tell the gender or ethnicity of the voters who decided these election results based on exit polls. It takes the Census Bureau months to come up with a more scientific analysis of the demographics.

The so-called gender gap has been an issue in US elections at least since the emergence of the women’s movement in the 1960-1970s. What statistics repeatedly show is that going back a few decades of elections, Black, Latino, Asian, & white women voters outnumber their male counterparts by several million & white women voters are close to three times the number of Black, Latino, & Asian women voters combined. What does one make of those statistics? Who the hell knows without a closer examination of who these women are? Election demographics are not destiny since there are still millions of women (& men) who don’t even bother to register or vote because they reject ‘all of the above’ with contempt.

But we don’t have to wait months for the Census Bureau. We don’t have to be a statistician or a supporter of either party to be impressed that women voters, women campaign volunteers & women candidates turned out for this election in unprecedented numbers. Record numbers of women were elected, including Black, Latino, & Native American women who took seats away from men. According to Brian Schaffner, an academic analyst of election results, these results were a repudiation of Trump’s misogyny & of Republican politics, including the Kavanaugh appointment. So how does that accord with the accusations that white women are the brake on social progress in this country?

This campaign against white women does not reflect the realities of racism & sexism in US politics but is an orchestrated campaign to divide Black, Latino, Asian, & Native American women from white women as archenemies, as nemeses in the struggle against women’s oppression. It’s the pernicious divide & conquer stuff that we are all too familiar with & it is regrettable, nay deplorable, that so many continue to fall for it. Of course racism is a problem among white women in the US. Not a single concession or compromise should be made with that reality. But this vilifying of white women is no part of any compromise & is intended solely to put women at odds with one another rather than unite in a common struggle against the oppression of women.

All this political treachery began in the 1960s with media misrepresentations of Second Wave feminism as white & middle class, ignoring that many of that generation came out of the civil rights movement inspired by the role Black women played; that Black & Latino women were a large, active part of the women’s movement; & that one of the central political demands was for abortion rights & against forced sterilization because eugenics was/is a fundamental issue for Black, Latino, Asian, & Native American women.

Photo is August 26, 1970 women’s march in Washington, DC; it was the first national public mobilization of Second Wave feminism with protests held around the country.

(Photo by Don Carl Steffen/Getty Images)