The sarcasms of neoliberal mining in Peru

Peru wildcat gold mines (Ernesto Benavides:AFP:Getty Images) July 25 2015

Some of the ugliest sarcasms of neoliberal economics are played out in the mining industry which runs operations on a scorched earth business model. There are many multinational corporations involved–US, Mexican, Canadian, Australian, Indian, Russian, Chinese. Their strip & open-pit mining practices have deforested & chemically contaminated millions of acres on every continent. Their recklessness has made entire regions uninhabitable for flora & fauna; destroyed migration routes for birds; contaminated rivers with acids, arsenic, mercury & other toxicities; created neurological & congenital health problems for thousands; destroyed the livelihoods of tens of thousands of farmers; & are making this beautiful planet a monstrous eyesore.

Peru’s economy, completely warped by mining, is a case in point. Peru is more than 60 percent Amazonian rainforest vital to controlling climate on Earth, but deforestation & land conversion for mining are turning it into a wasteland. Short-range profiteering is a fatal flaw of the neoliberal business model. Under scorched earth policies, Peru now depends on mining for 62 percent of its export earnings because the government has bent over backwards with incentives to mining companies. Investment in mining is now near $9 billion a year according to official figures.

While mining is a bonanza to the Peruvian elite, it is a disaster for farmers who are engaged in ongoing battles with riot police defending open-pit copper mines like the $1.4 billion Tia Maria operation contaminating fields, groundwater sources, crops, livestock. The company running Tia Maria is Grupo Mexico, the outfit that still hasn’t cleaned up its 2014 catastrophic spill from a copper mine in Sonora, Mexico.

For the past couple years, the Peruvian regime–while sending riot police to defend Tia Maria & other mines–have conducted police operations against illegal gold mine operations in the Amazon Basin of Madre de Dios bordering Brazil & Bolivia. Like storm troopers, they’ve burned down over 55 mining camps, blown up & confiscated equipment, closed down businesses in the area which serve miners. Most of the 40,000 wildcat miners are poor immigrants from the Andean highlands displaced by multinational mining operations going on there, most notably by a Chinese consortium.

No one ever said capitalism functioned rationally. In many African countries, the World Bank fosters artisanal & wildcat mining. Dispossessed & impoverished miners use low-tech methods to extract gold which they sell dirt cheap to an agent who sells it on the world market. Everybody makes out like a bandit–except the miners who suffer extreme health conditions.

Reports are vague about how wildcat mining operations in Madre de Dios are run. It’s likely that small companies hire workers to operate low-tech mines & then broker the gold for export because certainly the miners aren’t profiting–& illegal gold is now 20 percent of all gold exports from Peru, making it the world’s fifth biggest gold producer. Customs officials estimate the value at about $3 billion–more than export of Peruvian cocaine. Forty thousand miner shares of $3 billion would be a substantial income which the miners are not receiving but thieving brokers are.

There’s no question these mines should be closed down. All of them–not just the wildcat mines. It isn’t the environmental & health catastrophes, nor the displacement of tens of thousands of farmers that concern the regime, but that they aren’t getting their cut of the plunder from the wildcat operations.

Peruvian farmers & workers aren’t on this planet to serve as chattel for multinationals & they do not serve that role compliantly–which is why police repression is so severe in Peru. As long as there is continuing resistance to mining in Peru, there is hope. Our fullest solidarity with that resistance.

Photo is Peruvian riot police in La Pampa after one of their recent wrecking operations against wildcat mines whilst their comrades-in-arms defend the “legal” mines.

(Photo by Ernesto Benavides/AFP/Getty Images)

Japanese protest against re-militarizing

Japan

There have been protests of thousands for weeks against new military legislation being railroaded through the Japanese parliament. The proposed law would reverse Article 9 in the constitution outlawing the use of military for war. It’s essentially a “no war” article. It isn’t a pacifist commitment but was imposed by the US occupying regime after Japan’s defeat in WWII.

The reversal of Article 9 has been in the works for a while. Part of the railroading is coming from the US who want to incorporate Japan into an offensive naval & troop force as US competition with China heats up in the South China Sea & the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership goes into effect. There is no shyness about acknowledging all this in the media. Forbes, a voice of US capitalism, & other media sources lay it out quite bluntly.

The question is, what does Japan have to gain from re-militarizing since, even with US military aid, costs & affects on society will be immense? There are no glib answers to that. Japan is not an impoverished country but one of the strongest economies in the world. It is however facing economic, social, & political crises like every other neoliberal capitalist country. They’re not re-militarizing only to address regional conflicts with Korea or only to buttress US military might but because war is inherent to capitalism. The need is built into the system to try to resolve its internal crises & volatilities–like Fukushima–through war. There’s an economy to war that serves the ruling elite but devastates the lives of working people.

These protesters in Tokyo are denouncing the proposed militarization of Japan. Why should they send their young people abroad to fight when their real dispute is with their own regime?
Our fullest solidarity with them.

(Photo by Thomas Peter/Reuters)

Hillary Clinton the money-grubber

Hillary Clinton who earns between $200,000 & $300,000 for one of her wooden speeches & has all sorts of conditions attached (like private jet & full rights to the video), declines to endorse a raise in the federal minimum wage from $7.25 to $15.00 an hour. And she still has the chutzpah to play the populist card.